Why Cars Are Getting Harder to Drive Well (Even for Experienced Drivers)

Driving has never been easier at a basic level, yet it has never been harder to do well. Modern cars accelerate smoothly, steer lightly, brake automatically, and intervene before mistakes become accidents. Paradoxically, these very improvements are what make skilled driving more difficult, even for people with decades of experience behind the wheel.

In earlier generations of vehicles, driving skill was built through constant feedback. Steering effort, engine vibration, brake feel, and road noise provided continuous information about speed, traction, and mechanical limits. The driver learned intuitively by responding to these signals. Modern cars filter or eliminate much of this feedback in the name of comfort and safety.

Electric power steering is a clear example. While it improves efficiency and enables advanced driver assistance systems, it often removes subtle cues about tire grip and road surface. Experienced drivers accustomed to hydraulic steering find it harder to sense understeer, surface changes, or loss of traction, even though the car may still be objectively safer.

Throttle response has undergone a similar transformation. Mechanical linkages once connected the driver’s foot directly to the engine. Today, throttle-by-wire systems interpret driver input through software, prioritizing emissions, fuel efficiency, and smoothness. The result is delayed or nonlinear response that can make precise control more difficult, especially at low speeds or during dynamic maneuvers.

Braking systems further illustrate this shift. Modern brake-by-wire systems integrate anti-lock braking, stability control, and regenerative braking in hybrid and electric vehicles. While stopping distances have improved, pedal feel has become less consistent. Drivers must adapt to systems that decide how braking force is distributed, reducing the driver’s direct influence over the vehicle.

Driver assistance systems, while undeniably valuable for safety, also change how skills are developed and maintained. Lane-keeping assistance, adaptive cruise control, and collision avoidance systems reduce workload but also reduce engagement. Skills that once required constant attention are now partially outsourced to software.

This outsourcing creates a subtle dependency. Drivers become less practiced at maintaining lane position, judging closing speeds, or managing following distance. When systems disengage or fail, the driver is expected to instantly regain full control, often without the tactile or situational awareness that older vehicles naturally reinforced.

Touchscreen-based controls add another layer of complexity. Functions that were once adjusted by feel are now buried in menus that require visual attention. Adjusting climate settings, navigation, or driving modes often demands the driver look away from the road, increasing cognitive load rather than reducing it.

Cognitive load is one of the most overlooked aspects of modern driving difficulty. While individual systems are designed to help, their combined presence demands constant interpretation. Alerts, warnings, icons, and notifications compete for attention, forcing drivers to process information that is often poorly prioritized.

The concept of “mode confusion” has become increasingly relevant. Many cars now have multiple driving modes that alter steering weight, throttle response, suspension behavior, and transmission logic. Drivers may not always be aware of which mode is active, leading to mismatches between expectation and vehicle behavior.

Even experienced drivers struggle with this inconsistency. A car that responds one way in normal mode may behave entirely differently in sport or eco mode. Muscle memory, a critical component of skilled driving, becomes unreliable when inputs no longer produce consistent outputs.

Noise insulation, another comfort-driven improvement, also plays a role. Older vehicles transmitted engine and road sounds that helped drivers judge speed and mechanical strain. Modern cars are so quiet that drivers often underestimate speed, relying more heavily on visual cues and instrumentation.

Automation bias further complicates matters. When drivers repeatedly experience systems intervening successfully, they may overestimate those systems’ capabilities. This leads to reduced vigilance and slower reaction times, particularly in unexpected situations that fall outside system design parameters.

Research in human factors engineering shows that partial automation is often more demanding than either full manual control or full automation. Drivers must remain alert without being fully engaged, a state that is cognitively unstable and difficult to maintain over long periods.

The problem is not that drivers are becoming worse, but that the environment for skill development is changing. New drivers may never learn certain fundamentals because the car prevents them from making small mistakes that once served as learning opportunities.

Experienced drivers face a different challenge. They must unlearn habits formed in older vehicles while adapting to systems that behave unpredictably across brands and models. The skill ceiling rises while the feedback needed to reach it diminishes.

Driving instructors and training programs have not fully adapted to this reality. Most instruction still focuses on rules and procedures rather than on managing automation, interpreting system limits, or understanding human-machine interaction.

Examples from real-world driving illustrate the issue clearly. Drivers report difficulty judging parking maneuvers due to overly light steering and inconsistent brake response. Others describe hesitation during merging because adaptive systems interfere with throttle input.

In emergency situations, these challenges become more pronounced. When a driver must override automated systems, the delay between intention and vehicle response can feel unfamiliar, even alarming, despite years of experience.

Manufacturers face a difficult balance. They must design cars that meet safety regulations, appeal to a broad audience, and integrate rapidly advancing technology. The resulting compromise often favors risk reduction over driver skill preservation.

This does not mean modern cars are inferior. In fact, accident rates per mile driven have declined in many regions. However, safety outcomes do not equate to ease of skilled operation. A car can be statistically safer while being subjectively harder to drive well.

The future will likely intensify this trend. As vehicles become increasingly software-defined, the driver’s role will continue to shift from direct controller to system supervisor. Without deliberate design choices that prioritize human feedback, driving skill will erode further.

Understanding this shift is essential for drivers who care about competence, not just convenience. Skill in modern driving is no longer about mechanical mastery alone, but about understanding systems, limitations, and one’s own cognitive biases.

Driving well today requires more awareness, not less. It demands that drivers recognize what technology gives and what it quietly takes away. Only by acknowledging this tradeoff can experienced drivers adapt and maintain control in an increasingly mediated driving environment.

⸻

Resources and References

https://www.nhtsa.gov/road-safety/driver-assistance-technologies
https://www.iihs.org/topics/advanced-driver-assistance
https://www.sae.org/news/2021/07/human-machine-interface-in-modern-vehicles
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/15/1067975/cars-software-human-factors/
https://www.nhtsa.gov/human-factors
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/driver-behavior
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574056